London 2050 Summit – City of the Future

This week Ann Beatty was invited onto the panel of the London 2050 Summit to join the discussion on how technology will continue to shape our lives, and to offer a perspective of what the implications are for global education.

In the U.K. and globally, the pandemic has seen large numbers of people forced to work and socialise from home. Most of us are discovering new technology and experimenting with how it can be used to fill the gaps left by the various lockdowns. For some it means looking at entire home automation to enhance home life, work and entertainment life, and including these ideas in the new housing construction work of the future. For others it means questioning the pervasive role of technology in our lives, and building a future directed by human needs, not the needs of productivity and profit in isolation.

Technology is exciting, the possibilities are limited only by our imagination, and our development funding. So much is possible, but we need to make sure it is always fit for the purpose it is being used for. Algorithms are not better than teachers at predicting grades. Internet lessons can be a good way to deliver some aspects of education, if you have a stable internet connection and a device to study on, but online learning cannot replace professional expertise and the passion of teachers who inspire learning in students.

We have to be aware of the way we use technology to educate ourselves too, the potential for “Generation Google” is a double edged sword. It’s brilliant what we can learn and discover on YouTube and Google, but we have to be aware of the algorithms that are putting the content we consume up onto page 1 of a Google search. 

The fact is we need the right technology for the right situation. In The Gambia we found that solar radios were the right solution, to take into account not only a lack of internet connection, lack of equipment, and a lack of access to power. Working in a diverse range of countries makes us acutely aware of the limitations of the technology we have. Our technological advances are still very dependent on infrastructure put in place decades ago. Where that infrastructure does not yet exist, our technology fails. Likewise, if our infrastructure fails so does the technology that we now wholly rely on too. By including everyone in the picture of development we are finding a more robust and sustainable way forward for everyone.

The new 5G network forces a network structure based on digital capitalism. Potential threats to cyber-attack, sharing and use of our data. We need to keep our focus on how to use data to benefit humankind rather than just distract us from the gravity of our current situation.

We are already testing the boundaries of the tech world we have built. The Social Dilemma documentary by Jeff Orlowski (2020), highlights the dangerous impact of digital social networking. The need to connect is a very important drive, and if our connections, our communities and even community spaces are all brought online, then we lose a fundamental part of that connection, especially the power of physical touch. The Covid-19 lockdown periods have been like an experiment in how far can digital socialising go. Our experiences with this range from frustration and isolation to the joy and convenience of being able to chat with someone on the other side of the world without having to travel.

In education there is definitely a global digital divide, not all children have access to technology and yes, many children are addicted to smart phones but you cannot learn effectively on smart phones. In many families they do not have a quality laptop or computer, they may not have the space to learn in their homes. We are in a situation where the U.K. government set up a scheme for laptops to be provided in April of this year to families who needed them but the outcome was that only 37% of children who needed them were able to access these devices (Children’s Commissioner Aug 2020). If we cannot feed our children adequately and many families have to visit food banks there needs to be a review of the whole system as hungry children cannot learn even if they have access to the technology. We now have the time to Reflect, Re-imagine and Reset learning but it will need investment and we must not miss this opportunity globally.

We need to invest in education, and for that we need to go back to basics. we need a method of delivering quality education to people, we need to connect with each other, to make the connection with each other, ourselves and the world.

Clearly technology is a brilliant tool to transform our world, and tackle our deepest challenges too. It just has to be fit for purpose. So sometimes we have to remember that the low-tech solutions can be the best. Not everyone has access to the technology that others take for granted. Most of us are not in control of the technology we are surrounded by. 

So, this is what we need to be asking. Is this technology being used for the advancement of the human race, is it inclusive and is it sustainable? If it is driving the divides between people, if it is only being harnessed for productivity and the profits of a minority and driving the chasm between the wealthy and poor, then maybe we need to take action to alter the direction. When do we have enough technology? Doesn’t that depend on what we are using it for?

To move forward, we need to ask the right questions.

Gary Whitehall ended our panel discussion with this: If you want to do one thing that will make a difference, ask yourself this, “What can I heal?” Use technology to do that thing.

Thank you, please tell us in the comments below what you will heal with technology.
The Steve Sinnott Foundation • November 12, 2020
By Ann Beatty May 20, 2026
How a simple act of practical solidarity is transforming the journey to school in The Gambia’s Central River Region North Policies have been written. Schools have been built. Yet for many children in The Gambia’s Central River Region North, access to education is still measured in kilometres, not opportunity. 
By Laura Griffin May 13, 2026
‘In a single hour vast tracts of shaded woodland became a jumble of torn trees and upturned soil, exposed to the glare of the summer sun. Such land-clearing events are rare, but forests exhibit remarkable resilience in the face of disaster. I’m told that the Chinese character for ‘catastrophe’ is the same as that which represents the word ‘opportunity’. And, the blowdown, while catastrophic, presented opportunities for many species.’ (Wall Kimmerer, 2003: 89). In the context of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world (Stein, 2021) what kinds of education for hope might support children’s and young people’s critical engagement in local and global issues? In the spirit of exploring the possibilities of hope further, this short article focuses on the area of global citizenship and sustainabilityrelated education. It will briefly open by sharing commonalities across pedagogical approaches that take up the concept and act of hope more critically, and close by offering reflective questions for educators, with suggestions for further reading. Perhaps it is a kind of hope that is grounded in the present, in future reimagining(s), in ethical solidarity, and an acknowledgement of our deep entanglement with the living metabolism of planet earth 1 our singular home (UNESCO, 2021); a hope that engages with complex root causes and lived realities of multiple overlapping crises in critically reflexive and contextually relevant ways. As McCloskey notes, ‘Hope can fire our collective imagination and critical consciousness as a mainspring to activism and intervention in the world.’ (2025: 3). Commonalities across critical pedagogical approaches to hope include: Acknowledging the context of a ‘seamless single story of progress, development and human evolution’ (Andreotti, V.D.O., 2021b Relating to social and ecological justice and the wellbeing of people and planet Using participatory, action-orientated and inquiry-based learning processes Exploring diverse worldviews and perspectives Practising grounding in the present with opening up possibilities for change (relational, embodied, response-able 2 ) Experiencing ‘struggle’ in different forms (dialogical, selfreflexive, open-ended) Engaging individual and collective agency, action and activism Looking for lifelong and life-wide learning and unlearning. 1 See ‘Co-sensing with Radical Tenderness’, in Machado de Oliveira Andreotti. 2021a 2 See ‘Crossing Borders’ in 2 Depth Education “Depth Education and the Possibility of GCE Otherwise, 2021b. Source: Andreotti, V. 2021a & 2021b., Atif, A. (2025)., Bourn, D. 2021., Bryan. A. and Mochizuki,Y., 2024., Giroux, H.A. 2025., Meade, E. 2025. Whilst engaging in the concept and act of hope more critically reflect upon: What kinds of education for hope might you explore further and why? How might you provide generative spaces for engaging in diverse worldviews and perspectives? In what ways can you facilitate individual and collective agency? How might you support learners’ practice grounding in the present in order to relate differently? In what ways can you support learners in navigating complex root causes and lived realities of local and global issues? As Chief Ninawa Hini Kui affirms, ‘The future depends much less on the images we project ahead than on our capacity to repair relations and build relationships differently in the present.’ (Andreotti et al, 2023: 73. An invitation for further reading: Transformative Learning for a Sustainable Future . d’Abreu, C., Belgeonne, C., Bourn, D. and Hatley, J. (2025) ‘Transformative Learning for a Sustainable Future’. DERC Research Paper 24. London: UCL Institute of Education. Hospicing Modernity: facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. Machado de Oliveira Andreotti, V. (2021a) ‘Hospicing Modernity: facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism’ , London: Penguin Random House. Development Education and Hope . McCloskey, S. (2025). (ed) ‘Development Education and Hope’. ‘Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review’ , Vol. 41, Autumn. Centre for Global Education, Belfast. Link to and download the full reference list here
By Susan Piper May 6, 2026
This summed up to me about why I volunteer for the Hands Up Project. HUP is a charity trust which, through its network of volunteers, connects children around the world with young people in Palestine. By means of online interaction, drama and storytelling activities, it enables the use of creativity and selfexpression to promote mutual understanding, personal growth, and the development of English language skills. I joined HUP in 2020 during COVID. After going to Palestine in 2017, I wanted to get more involved in working with Palestinian children in schools. HUP gave me the opportunity to link up with schools in the West Bank and Gaza. Every week I’d tell them stories from all over the world, then we’d discuss it, play games and I’d get them to retell it. Sometimes we would work from their coursebook English for Palestine’ in mutual team teaching sessions with their teacher. The simple act of telling a story became much more than entertainment. It became connection, healing, and a bridge to the world beyond their immediate reality to help them improve their language skills, and to give them a platform to speak about their lives in a language that connects them to people everywhere. I loved it, every week, seeing their smiling faces on the screen and building long lasting friendships with their teachers. I even went to Gaza in 2023 and met some of the kids I’d only seen on Zoom. It was a beautiful experience and something I will never forget. As hostilities escalated, I lost contact with everyone. I thought about where the kids were and what had happened to them. As I watched schools being bombed, universities flattened, and people killed in their thousands, I thought about where the kids I’d met were and what was happening to them. I kept in contact with many of the teachers I knew and heard daily news of displacement, destruction, hunger and bombing. Recently, I’ve started to link up again with children in Gaza, and it feels wonderful to be back helping them learn after being denied an education for over two years. Connecting with children in Palestine is more than just words. When a child in Palestine confidently tells their story to someone on the other side of the world, bridges are built, empathy grows, and the world gains a fuller picture of childhood in contexts far from peace and privilege. My work with these children is rooted in the belief that education and voice are inseparable. Through storytelling and English language learning, I witness children not just learning new vocabulary, but reclaiming their narratives, believing in their potential, and finding human connection in a world they perceive has abandoned them. And more than anything, this work reminds us all that children — everywhere — deserve to learn, to speak, and to be heard. Links to HUP information, books and resources: The Hands Up Project BY SUSAN PIPER Susan Piper is currently an ESOL teacher in Oldham, Greater Manchester and has worked in education for over 30 years. She is also a volunteer for the Hands Up Project and is the International Solidarity Officer and President of her NEU district. She believes in quality education for all and aims to make her lessons creative and inclusive so that effective language learning can take place.