Relationships and SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)

As the founding Headteacher of two start-up schools in Oxfordshire, one primary and one secondary, we spent a lot of time thinking about our new schools’ vision, mission and values. We were deeply committed to becoming values-based educational settings. We also did a lot of work on our global citizenship curriculum which formally brought together all of the loose threads in what Dr Neil Hawkes calls the ‘inner curriculum’. Working towards UNICEF’s Rights Respecting School Award to demonstrate our intentional teaching of the UN’s SDGs was a fundamental part of our commitment to our school communities.


When I left headship to move #DiverseEd from being a grassroots community to iterating into Diverse Educators, a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) training and consultancy organisation, I thought once again about how our work supported the education system in working towards the SDGs and we outlined them here: www.thebelongingeffect.co.uk/the-sustainable-development-goals


Five years on, we have just gone through a re-brand, and we are now called the Belonging Effect. For me the strategic intention we take towards developing consciousness, confidence and competence in DEIB must be actionable and must have impact. So our renewed mission is ‘shaping intention into impact’


We are in the decade of action to work towards achieving the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as outlined by the United Nations.


The Belonging Effect is committed to doing the work across our network by connecting our training offer, our events programmes, and our desired outcomes (as well as our vision, mission, values and strategic vision) with the global goals to transform our world, together.


  • We believe in a shared vision and a collective responsibility in working towards the SDGs, together.
  • We believe that through meaningful collaborative partnerships across our network and wider education community, we can have a greater impact in addressing societal issues, together.
  • We believe that our schools are shaping global citizens and that we are all responsible for the world that we co-create, together.

Whilst we believe there is a part for all of us as educators and schools to play in all seventeen SDGs, we align our work specifically to seven of the SDGs as outlined below through our commitments:

3. Good health and wellbeing

4. Quality education

5. Gender equality

8. Decent work and economic growth

10. Reduced inequalities

16. Peace, justice and strong institutions

17. Partnerships for goals


How do the SDGs influence the way we think about human relationships in schools?

We need to reflect on the levels of diversity in our different stakeholder groups and who gets opportunities and who can access resources. We need to focus on names, not numbers. We need to invest in connection, not correction. We need to work in collaboration and co-create solutions to problems.


Which SDGs are most directly connected to the school environment?

We need to focus on mental health and wellbeing and realise how closely related it is to other aspects of our identity and lived experience. We need to ensure that all children receive their entitlement to an inclusive and representative curriculum enabling them to thrive and prosper in their adult lives.


How can schools build partnerships with local communities to promote inclusive education and shared responsibility for SDG goals?

We need to create a map of our community partnerships and spend time investing to ensure there is mutual reciprocity. We need to intentionally weave a web of key relationships around our school and distribute the responsibility of leaders in maintaining them and ensuring there is open dialogue to feed the culture and the ethos of the setting.


Imagine a school in 2030 that has fully embraced the SDGs: what do relationships look like there?

We will have collapsed the power hierarchy, we will have embedded democratic decision-making and we will be ensuring that all voices will matter. We will see the benefits of a more representative leadership and governance model. We will hear from our learners that they have a greater sense of belonging.


How can educational policies be re-designed to prioritise healthy relationships as part of achieving SDG 4?

Educational policies need to be co-designed as there is often a disconnect between who writes the policy, who ratifies the policy versus who the policy serves. We have systemic and societal issues to resolve such as anti-racism and meaningful inclusion of our most vulnerable learners, alongside increased belonging for individuals and groups who are marginalised by the system. We need the subject of any policy reform to be actively involved in the process and changes to ensure they resonate and reduce harm.

 

Do check out our website to find out more about our DEIB work. You might also be interested in my new book which is coming out in the new year entitled ‘How to Cultivate Belonging in Schools’.



Hannah Wilson • February 2, 2026
By Ann Beatty June 1, 2026
On Friday evening ( 29 May, 7.00 pm The Actors Church Covent Garden) we had the pleasure of listening to this very special concert, bringing together the Choir of King's College London and the Princeton High School Orchestra in a celebration of international friendship, collaboration, and shared values. This project reflects a commitment to peace, sustainability, equality, and cultural exchange, uniting young musicians from the United Kingdom and the United States through the universal language of music.
By Ann Beatty May 20, 2026
How a simple act of practical solidarity is transforming the journey to school in The Gambia’s Central River Region North Policies have been written. Schools have been built. Yet for many children in The Gambia’s Central River Region North, access to education is still measured in kilometres, not opportunity. 
By Laura Griffin May 13, 2026
‘In a single hour vast tracts of shaded woodland became a jumble of torn trees and upturned soil, exposed to the glare of the summer sun. Such land-clearing events are rare, but forests exhibit remarkable resilience in the face of disaster. I’m told that the Chinese character for ‘catastrophe’ is the same as that which represents the word ‘opportunity’. And, the blowdown, while catastrophic, presented opportunities for many species.’ (Wall Kimmerer, 2003: 89). In the context of a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous world (Stein, 2021) what kinds of education for hope might support children’s and young people’s critical engagement in local and global issues? In the spirit of exploring the possibilities of hope further, this short article focuses on the area of global citizenship and sustainabilityrelated education. It will briefly open by sharing commonalities across pedagogical approaches that take up the concept and act of hope more critically, and close by offering reflective questions for educators, with suggestions for further reading. Perhaps it is a kind of hope that is grounded in the present, in future reimagining(s), in ethical solidarity, and an acknowledgement of our deep entanglement with the living metabolism of planet earth 1 our singular home (UNESCO, 2021); a hope that engages with complex root causes and lived realities of multiple overlapping crises in critically reflexive and contextually relevant ways. As McCloskey notes, ‘Hope can fire our collective imagination and critical consciousness as a mainspring to activism and intervention in the world.’ (2025: 3). Commonalities across critical pedagogical approaches to hope include: Acknowledging the context of a ‘seamless single story of progress, development and human evolution’ (Andreotti, V.D.O., 2021b Relating to social and ecological justice and the wellbeing of people and planet Using participatory, action-orientated and inquiry-based learning processes Exploring diverse worldviews and perspectives Practising grounding in the present with opening up possibilities for change (relational, embodied, response-able 2 ) Experiencing ‘struggle’ in different forms (dialogical, selfreflexive, open-ended) Engaging individual and collective agency, action and activism Looking for lifelong and life-wide learning and unlearning. 1 See ‘Co-sensing with Radical Tenderness’, in Machado de Oliveira Andreotti. 2021a 2 See ‘Crossing Borders’ in 2 Depth Education “Depth Education and the Possibility of GCE Otherwise, 2021b. Source: Andreotti, V. 2021a & 2021b., Atif, A. (2025)., Bourn, D. 2021., Bryan. A. and Mochizuki,Y., 2024., Giroux, H.A. 2025., Meade, E. 2025. Whilst engaging in the concept and act of hope more critically reflect upon: What kinds of education for hope might you explore further and why? How might you provide generative spaces for engaging in diverse worldviews and perspectives? In what ways can you facilitate individual and collective agency? How might you support learners’ practice grounding in the present in order to relate differently? In what ways can you support learners in navigating complex root causes and lived realities of local and global issues? As Chief Ninawa Hini Kui affirms, ‘The future depends much less on the images we project ahead than on our capacity to repair relations and build relationships differently in the present.’ (Andreotti et al, 2023: 73. An invitation for further reading: Transformative Learning for a Sustainable Future . d’Abreu, C., Belgeonne, C., Bourn, D. and Hatley, J. (2025) ‘Transformative Learning for a Sustainable Future’. DERC Research Paper 24. London: UCL Institute of Education. Hospicing Modernity: facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. Machado de Oliveira Andreotti, V. (2021a) ‘Hospicing Modernity: facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism’ , London: Penguin Random House. Development Education and Hope . McCloskey, S. (2025). (ed) ‘Development Education and Hope’. ‘Policy and Practice: A Development Education Review’ , Vol. 41, Autumn. Centre for Global Education, Belfast. Link to and download the full reference list here